Skip to content
AI + Quantum Ethics Standards

Charter for Ethical AI and Quantum Computing Standards

Purpose

This initiative develops and maintains a living corpus of standards for AI and quantum computing (QC) that are globally applicable, regulator-ready, and grounded in human dignity, justice, unity, safety, and responsible scientific advancement.

Why This Exists

AI and QC can produce extraordinary benefits, and also enable concentrated power, irreversible harm, and dual-use misuse. A credible standards effort must therefore:

  • translate ethical commitments into testable requirements,
  • specify evidence that can be audited, and
  • provide governance mechanisms that are participatory and trustworthy.

Values and Commitments

We commit to:

  • Human dignity and agency: people remain the moral and legal subjects of decisions affecting them.
  • Justice and remedy: affected parties can understand, contest, and obtain correction for harmful decisions.
  • Truthfulness and transparency: claims about capability, risk, and compliance are accurate and verifiable.
  • Safety and stewardship: systems are developed and operated with proportionality to risk and with attention to societal and environmental impacts.
  • Consultative governance: decision-making is multi-stakeholder, transparent, and accountable.

Scope of Ambition

This corpus provides:

  • an ethical foundation (00_foundations/ethical_axioms.md),
  • a risk framework (04_risk_framework/*),
  • technical standards for AI and QC (02_ai_standards/*, 03_quantum_standards/*),
  • audit and assurance mechanisms (05_audit_and_assurance/*),
  • case studies to stress-test applicability (06_case_studies/*).

Governance Philosophy

The corpus is:

  • living: improved over time as evidence and practice evolve,
  • traceable: every requirement maps to axioms and evidence (ETHICAL_TRACEABILITY.md),
  • disciplined: changes follow transparent rules (VERSIONING.md, 01_governance/governance_model.md).

Relationship to Existing Institutions

This initiative is intended to be interoperable with existing frameworks and standards bodies. It seeks alignment and practical adoption, not competition or “replacement.”

Public Trust

We welcome critique, diverse participation, and independent review. We treat transparency, auditability, and the ability to pause high-risk deployment as conditions of legitimacy.