Crosswalk to Existing AI and Technology Governance Frameworks
Purpose
Section titled “Purpose”This document demonstrates alignment and interoperability with widely used international frameworks. It is intended to:
- reduce duplication,
- improve legibility for regulators and auditors, and
- identify where this corpus adds value (e.g., ethical traceability and AI+QC integration).
This crosswalk is non-normative.
The crosswalk focuses on high-level concepts and control families. Detailed, clause-by-clause mappings may be added over time.
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)
Section titled “NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)”NIST AI RMF organizes activities into four functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE.
| NIST AI RMF Function | Related Corpus Areas |
|---|---|
| GOVERN | 00_foundations/*, 01_governance/*, VERSIONING.md, ETHICAL_TRACEABILITY.md, 05_audit_and_assurance/* |
| MAP | 04_risk_framework/risk_classification.md, 00_foundations/scope_and_non_scope.md, case studies in 06_case_studies/* |
| MEASURE | 02_ai_standards/* (evaluations), 05_audit_and_assurance/metrics.md, testing evidence requirements |
| MANAGE | 02_ai_standards/safety.md, 02_ai_standards/accountability.md, incident response and change control requirements |
ISO/IEC AI Risk Management Standards (e.g., ISO/IEC 23894)
Section titled “ISO/IEC AI Risk Management Standards (e.g., ISO/IEC 23894)”ISO/IEC AI risk management guidance emphasizes lifecycle risk processes, governance, documentation, and continuous improvement.
| ISO/IEC Risk Topic | Related Corpus Areas |
|---|---|
| Governance and accountability | 01_governance/governance_model.md, 02_ai_standards/accountability.md |
| Risk assessment and treatment | 02_ai_standards/safety.md, 04_risk_framework/risk_classification.md |
| Documentation and transparency | 02_ai_standards/transparency_and_explainability.md, 05_audit_and_assurance/audit_methods.md |
| Monitoring and improvement | 05_audit_and_assurance/metrics.md, incident and remediation expectations |
OECD AI Principles
Section titled “OECD AI Principles”The OECD AI Principles emphasize inclusive growth, human-centered values, transparency, robustness/security, and accountability.
| OECD Principle Theme | Related Corpus Areas |
|---|---|
| Human-centered values and fairness | 00_foundations/ethical_axioms.md (A1–A3), 02_ai_standards/fairness_and_justice.md |
| Transparency and responsible disclosure | 02_ai_standards/transparency_and_explainability.md, 03_quantum_standards/cryptographic_and_security_risk.md (claim controls) |
| Robustness, security, and safety | 02_ai_standards/safety.md, 03_quantum_standards/national_security.md |
| Accountability | 02_ai_standards/accountability.md, 05_audit_and_assurance/* |
UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI
Section titled “UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI”UNESCO’s recommendation addresses human rights, transparency, accountability, sustainability, and governance mechanisms.
| UNESCO Theme | Related Corpus Areas |
|---|---|
| Human rights and dignity | 00_foundations/ethical_axioms.md (A2, A3), contestability requirements across AI standards |
| Transparency and explainability | 02_ai_standards/transparency_and_explainability.md |
| Accountability and governance | 01_governance/*, 05_audit_and_assurance/*, ETHICAL_TRACEABILITY.md |
| Sustainability | 00_foundations/ethical_axioms.md (A7), 05_audit_and_assurance/metrics.md |
Where This Corpus Adds Value (Non-exhaustive)
Section titled “Where This Corpus Adds Value (Non-exhaustive)”- Ethical traceability as a compliance primitive: mandatory requirement-to-axiom-to-evidence mapping (
ETHICAL_TRACEABILITY.md). - Unified AI + Quantum dual-use framing: QC-specific controls integrated into tiering and assurance.
- Moratorium-capable governance for Tier 3 systems: explicit pause/escalation mechanisms (
ESCALATION_AND_PAUSE.md).
Maintenance
Section titled “Maintenance”Crosswalk updates SHOULD accompany MINOR releases when new standards are added or when external frameworks materially evolve.